- From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:40:39 -0800
- To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
I agree with Walter. It ought to be a must… On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl> wrote: > On 16/12/2013 15:23, mts-std@schunter.org wrote: > >> If nobody makes a case for / against including this link, I suggest to >> continue with the Status quo and reject Roy's proposed edit and not >> include a link. > > It may possibly be such a no-brainer that we accept at least the gist of > Roy's proposed edit that we haven't really discussed it so far. If > anything, since we are about control and transparency for the user, I > would be in favour of strengthening the MAY into a MUST. Because it > should be clear what compliance spec a site is following if it claims > any form of compliance at all. It also meshes better with the way the > web works than a specific compliance spec identifier. > > Regards, > > Walter >
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 19:41:06 UTC