Re: Issue 153

On 04/12/2013 21:48, Brad Kulick wrote:
> Matthias,
> Respectfully, I would like to maintain my objection for closing
> Issue-153 and allow it to proceed to CFO. Given the lower than normal
> participation for today's call, I would appreciate allowing for
> process to complete to ensure any other similar viewpoints are
> represented.

In order to do so I suggest we get text proposals on how to address this
(in my opinion) non-issue or at least unadressable issue. May I also
remind you that any burdens on UA makers that would restrict
implementation to DNT to specific browsers or would impede UA makers to
license their UAs as they see fit is also likely to contravene the W3C
design principles.

Moreover, any such proposals should cover the question on how it will
deal with UA agent string manipulation.



Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 22:31:29 UTC