- From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 17:35:49 +0000
- To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Walter, If Web Browsers can not fully implement DNT TPE, why are Servers required to fully implement? It's this balance that's completely missing in your argument. As far as your questions, perhaps I missed those - can you please resend? - Shane -----Original Message----- From: Walter van Holst [mailto:walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 12:29 PM To: public-tracking@w3.org Subject: Re: any additional Proposals on UA requirement to handle exceptions On 06/12/2013 18:20, Shane M Wiley wrote: > As long as you're comfortable with Servers reserving the right to not recognize DNT signals from browsers that don't support UGE, this could be acceptable. > What in my previous mails made you think that I am comfortable with servers ignoring perfectly valid expressions of a wish not to be tracked? Also, you still have not answered any of my questions other than something closely resembling a "I want to ignore DNT for arbitrary reasons". Regards, Walter
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 17:36:42 UTC