- From: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:17:47 +0100
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
On 06/12/2013 18:07, Shane M Wiley wrote: > Walter, > > JS support is open source (Web-kit) so it's not as if they need to > build it from scratch. Alternatively, a blind user can leverage > Safari or IE which have excellent text reader support (FF may as well > but I only remember Victor, a blind member of our accessibility team, > mentioning those two). > > That said, you're bringing up exactly the use cases that overly > burden version 1 of DNT. If we narrow support to only web browsers > to start we remove the network router issue. If we narrow to only JS > browsers, we remove situations where user preference is unbalanced. > As we learn more in v1 we'll have the experience to guide how best to > address these edge cases. I am sorry Shane. Integrating web-kit into a text-only browser is still a non-trivial undertaking. Especially with a small developer base. Also, you have nowhere answered my questions a-d, stating that those are cases where user preference is 'unbalanced' (whatever that may mean) is not answering those questions. Regarding burdening DNT: having a MUST support UGE requirement in it is overburdening it. The easiest way not to overburden the TPE is by remaining silent on the subject. Regards, Walter
Received on Friday, 6 December 2013 17:18:15 UTC