- From: David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:46:14 -0500
- To: Justin Brookman <justin@cdt.org>
- CC: public-tracking@w3.org
Hi Justin, On 11/13/12 2:06 PM, Justin Brookman wrote: > but requiring disclosure about an unproven parade of horribles in > advance is not something that a technical standards setting body > should be contemplating. I believe we've already agreed that the DNT signal should reflect the user's explicit and informed consent. Doesn't the informed piece of that equation require explanation of the effects of DNT? But I can see that if you do not believe that provisions in this spec will have negative effects for the internet and internet users, then you wouldn't see the need for informing users of such negative effects. So, what do we need to do to convince you? Once we're on common ground about that, then maybe we can have a more productive conversation about how best to inform users. -David
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2012 21:46:44 UTC