- From: Matthias Schunter <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:35:31 +0200
- To: Kimon Zorbas <vp@iabeurope.eu>
- CC: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>, Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4FB11833.8050307@schunter.org>
Hi Kimon, I believe that this also holds for DNT with transitive exceptions: - If an ad-network receives an exception, this holds for its descendants too (the transitivity) - These third parties are then exempted from the DNT constraints and can use the collected data as before - This includes cross-site use among sites where a user has agreed to an exception E.g., if a user granted a site-wide exception at site1 and site2 and both use an adnetwork adnet1 then adnet1 can correlated the data collected at site1 and site2. However, if a user has not granted a site-wide exception for site3, then the data collected via site3 is still constrained by DNT and must not be pooled for cross-site use. Regards, On 09/05/2012 19:46, Kimon Zorbas wrote: > Nick, I think this goes even beyond what data protection authorities > have been discussing. They would allow for an ad-network to be > "authorised" on via website and use data cross-sites. > > We need to discuss this with our members, as we see the transpositions > across the EU/EEA to not be coherent or consistent. > > Kind regards, > Kimon > > Kimon Zorbas Vice President IAB Europe > > IAB Europe - The Egg > Rue Barastraat 175 > 1070 Brussels - Belgium > Phone +32 (0)2 5265 568 > Mob +32 494 34 91 68 > Fax +32 2 526 55 60 > vp@iabeurope.eu > Twitter: @kimon_zorbas > > www.iabeurope.eu and www.interactcongress. eu > > IAB Europe supports the .eu domain name www.eurid.eu > > IAB Europe is supported by: > > Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, > France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, > Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, > Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine and United Kingdom representing their > 5.000 members. The IAB network represents over 90% of European digital > revenues and is acting as voice for the industry at National and > European level. > > IAB Europe is powered by: > > Adconion Media Group, Adobe, ADTECH, Alcatel-Lucent, AOL Advertising > Europe, AudienceScience, BBCAdvertising, CNN, comScore Europe, CPX > Interactive, Criteo, eBay International Advertising, Expedia Inc, Fox > Interactive Media, Gemius, Goldbach Media Group, Google, GroupM, > Hi-Media, Koan, Microsoft Europe, Millward Brown, News Corporation, > nugg.ad, Nielsen Online, OMD, Orange Advertising Network, PHD,Prisa, > Publicitas Europe, Quisma, Sanoma Digital, Selligent, TradeDoubler, > Triton Digital, United Internet Media, ValueClick, Verisign, Viacom > International Media Networks, White & Case, Yahoo! and zanox. > > IAB Europe is associated with: Advance International Media, Banner, > Emediate, NextPerformance, Right Media, Tribal Fusion and Turn Europe > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Nicholas Doty" <npdoty@w3.org> > To: "Tracking Protection Working Group" <public-tracking@w3.org> > Cc: "Matthias Schunter" <mts-std@schunter.org> > Subject: transitivity of DNT exceptions > Date: Wed, May 9, 2012 7:45 am > > > > After some discussion of transitivity of exceptions on last week's > call and some follow-up with Matthias, it sounds like there might be > interest in specific exceptions (that might help with EU or other > jurisdictions) for top-level third parties. For example, maybe a large > site could more easily specify the ad networks or exchanges it works > with in requesting an exception (such that those domains receive a > DNT:0 opt-in signal) and then all further re-directs would also be > excepted, because the further third-parties aren't using the data for > any additional purposes (via some version of our Outsourcing > exception, and perhaps fitting an EU "data processor" definition). > > Does this sound workable for interpretations of EU law? For site or > browser implementers? > > Do we see other definitions of "transitivity of exceptions" that would > be useful? Browsers could, for example, send DNT:0 to all resources > that are re-directed from a request that was initiated with DNT:0, but > that sounds both annoying to implement (for browser plug-ins, for > example) and sometimes specifically not the intent of an exception > (URL re-direction services, maybe). > > Thanks, > Nick > > (This isn't meant to duplicate Ian's action-194, though maybe it will > be related.)
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 14:35:57 UTC