W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 02:03:29 +0200
To: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
Cc: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <03r0q7dfh1s1obulggl6e2pjbmvj1r039v@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* JC Cannon wrote:
>If a website is designed to track its members, it provides clear notice
>to consumers and users agree to the tracking then the site can be
>compliant with DNT while ignoring the header. Explain where they are not
>compliant and why it would be deceptive?

Let's say the Working Group adopts the proposal and there is a web site
"designed to track its members, it provides clear notice to consumers
and users agree to the tracking", but it is not compliant with the DNT
specifications. Could you give a couple of examples of what the site
might be doing that renders it non-compliant? If you can't, then being
compliant with the DNT specifications means the same as not being com-
pliant with the DNT specifications, as far as you are concerned anyway.
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 00:03:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:42 UTC