Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal

* David Singer wrote:
>I think we are in rough agreement, however, "if the user sends the
>conflicting signals of an explicit permission, with a DNT:1, then the
>explicit permission overrides the DNT signal" seems correct to me.  It's
>not out of scope to resolve such conflicts and state what overrides

You are arguing from the header upwards while I am arguing from the per-
mission downwards. I say "If there is permission, ignore the header" and
you are saying "look at the header, and then check for permission, and
if there is permission, then ignore the header". My approach is simpler.
Björn Höhrmann · ·
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 ·
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · 

Received on Sunday, 29 April 2012 02:13:18 UTC