W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Action-157: Update logged-in consent proposal

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 04:12:50 +0200
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8c7pp7dldetmig148as6a35mbsf8ri9g68@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* David Singer wrote:
>I think we are in rough agreement, however, "if the user sends the
>conflicting signals of an explicit permission, with a DNT:1, then the
>explicit permission overrides the DNT signal" seems correct to me.  It's
>not out of scope to resolve such conflicts and state what overrides

You are arguing from the header upwards while I am arguing from the per-
mission downwards. I say "If there is permission, ignore the header" and
you are saying "look at the header, and then check for permission, and
if there is permission, then ignore the header". My approach is simpler.
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Sunday, 29 April 2012 02:13:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:40 UTC