- From: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:48:34 -0500
- To: Sean Harvey <sharvey@google.com>
- CC: Jeffrey Chester <jeff@democraticmedia.org>, JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>, John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>, "<public-tracking@w3.org> (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4ED51AF2.3030908@appnexus.com>
Assuming the data was collected with consent for that purpose, why not? On 11/29/11 12:39 PM, Sean Harvey wrote: > to my mind the first party should not be using any third party data > for targeting in a DNT-on context, and I thought that was stated > elsewhere in the email chain, though I can go back and check. > > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:26 PM, David Wainberg > <dwainberg@appnexus.com <mailto:dwainberg@appnexus.com>> wrote: > > This raises an interesting issue with how this is going to work. > If the user engaged DNT after the data was collected, we probably > have consensus that prior collected data should not be used. > However, if the user had DNT at the time the data was collected, > but granted an exception to DNT, the data is ok to be used. The > problem is, how does the 1st party know the difference? It will > fall on the 3rd party to honor the user's choices, and the 1st > party will have to trust them. > > > > On 11/29/11 9:50 AM, Jeffrey Chester wrote: >> If a DNT system is to work, it must address how first party sites >> incorporate third party data and also use ad exchanges. If a >> user has said they do not want to be tracked via a third party >> data service, such as eXelate, BlueKai or Experian (for example) >> then such user data should not be automatically imported or used >> by the First party site. Sites increasingly mix in-house data >> with third party targeting data. A user should have reasonable >> control of this process under DNT. >> >> >> >> Jeffrey Chester >> Center for Digital Democracy >> 1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 550 >> Washington, DC 20009 >> www.democraticmedia.org <http://www.democraticmedia.org> >> >> On Nov 28, 2011, at 7:59 PM, JC Cannon wrote: >> >>> John, >>> I believe we are already in agreement that DNT will not apply to >>> 1^st party sites. I understand the need to clarify that 3^rd >>> -party sharing will be limited to certain exceptions, but I >>> don’t want to revisit something we have already agreed on. >>> JC >>> Twitter <http://twitter.com/jccannon7> >>> *From:*John Simpson [mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org] >>> *Sent:*Monday, November 28, 2011 4:47 PM >>> *To:*<public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>> >>> (public-tracking@w3.org <mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>) >>> *Subject:*Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations >>> Colleagues, >>> I've been thinking a bit more about the idea of "1st Party" >>> obligations if we use the frame of a 1st Party and 3rd Party >>> distinction. It seems clear to me that there is consensus that >>> the 1st Party must not share data (some will say there are >>> exceptions) with a 3rd party when DNT is enabled. >>> It does seem to me there are further obligations. When I go to >>> a 1st party site and interact with it, I assume it is using my >>> information for that transaction. If I >>> have DNT enabled, I don't have ANY expectation that it will >>> continue to use that information beyond that transaction. The >>> site should ask me if it can continue to store the information >>> and use it beyond that specific visit to the site. >>> In other words from my perspective as a user, a 1st Party site >>> should treat me as if I had cleared all my cookies the next time >>> I visit the site if I have DNT enabled. >>> When DNT is enabled, a 1st party should treat each session with >>> a user as an entirely new session unless it has been given >>> permission to store his information and use it again. >>> 73s, >>> John >>> ---------- >>> John M. Simpson >>> Consumer Advocate >>> Consumer Watchdog >>> 1750 Ocean Park Blvd. ,Suite 200 >>> Santa Monica, CA,90405 >>> Tel: 310-392-7041 <tel:310-392-7041> >>> Cell: 310-292-1902 <tel:310-292-1902> >>> www.ConsumerWatchdog.org <http://www.ConsumerWatchdog.org> >>> john@consumerwatchdog.org <mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org> >> > > > > -- > Sean Harvey > Business Product Manager > Google, Inc. > 212-381-5330 > sharvey@google.com <mailto:sharvey@google.com>
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 17:49:08 UTC