- From: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:46:01 -0500
- To: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org WG (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Message-ID: <4EC53A49.4000304@appnexus.com>
Isn't the "cross-site" or "across-site" definition all we need? If a 1st party has cross-site data, wasn't it, by definition, collected as a 3rd party in some contexts? So what would be 1st party cross-site data? Is there such a thing? If all the data is collected in the 1st party context, haven't we all but agreed that it won't be within our definition of cross-site tracking? Or are some people saying that a party that has a 1st party relationship with a user has an unqualified ability to collect data on completely unrelated sites, even with DNT:1? On 11/15/11 5:59 PM, John Simpson wrote: > Perhaps I am missing something, but I don't understand why we need the > reference to "cross-site" nor to "across sites." As a user I want to > send a clear and unambiguous signal that I do not wish to be tracked. > I may be persuaded that first party sites and third party sites have > different obligations when my message is received, but I definitely > want both first and third party sites to get my message. Thus, I > believe the specification should simply read: > > "This specification defines the technical mechanisms for expressing a > tracking preference via the DNT request header field in HTTP." > > 73s, > John > > > > On Nov 15, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > >> >> On 14/11/2011, at 6:26 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: >> >>> Old: >>> This specification defines the technical mechanisms >>> for expressing a cross-site tracking preference via >>> the DNT request header field in HTTP… >>> >>> New: >>> This specification defines the technical mechanisms >>> for expressing a tracking preference across sites >>> via the DNT request header field in HTTP >> >> The subject of the constraint here is still *sites*, not transfer of >> data between parties. >> >> Perhaps something like: >> >> This specification defines the technical mechanisms for >> expressing a preference regarding transfer of tracking data >> between parties via the DNT request header field in HTTP >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham >> http://www.mnot.net/ >> >> >> >> >> > > ---------- > John M. Simpson > Consumer Advocate > Consumer Watchdog > 1750 Ocean Park Blvd. ,Suite 200 > Santa Monica, CA,90405 > Tel: 310-392-7041 > Cell: 310-292-1902 > www.ConsumerWatchdog.org <http://www.ConsumerWatchdog.org> > john@consumerwatchdog.org <mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org> >
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 16:46:29 UTC