- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:08:33 -0600
- To: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
On 16/11/2011, at 2:17 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> I think this distinction is important, because using a (pseudo-) technical term as the basis of DNT's semantics opens it to technical circumvention. > > There is nothing in the term that impacts how the protocol is implemented. > What it impacts is the scope of compliance in terms of user expectations. Absolutely. This needs to be *very* clearly defined, in the document. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 20:08:56 UTC