On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com> wrote: > I've also reviewed the changes and added a couple comments. Thanks > Patrick! > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> > wrote: > >> On 10/02/2015 19:57, Jacob Rossi wrote: >> >>> I added a couple minor comments to the PR. We probably should have >>> some sort of summary section that says what's changed since the >>> initial REC. Could you add that? Something like what's in the >>> Pointer Events spec's appendix. >>> >> >> Worth doing it now, or when we're ready to publish? In meantime, if it's >> only on github, people can view a complete breakdown of commits... > > > I'd argue it's fine to wait until we publish to synthesize this from the > GitHub commit list. We should make an effort to have descriptive one-line > commit summaries and descriptions to make that job easier. > > This all reminds me of 'ChangeLog' files in WebKit - the value doesn't > justify the added burden on each commit IMHO. > I second Rick's remark. If the commit messages are descriptive enough (should be part of the review process, I guess) then generating them from the commit messages should be fairly easy. -- Sangwhan Moon [Opera Software ASA] Software Engineer | Tokyo, Japan
Received on Friday, 13 February 2015 07:10:50 UTC