Hello everyone, We're getting close to finalizing the plan for migrating close to 500 wptserve handlers we have in WPT. Now we have a few concrete steps to take: 1. Regarding the trial PR <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/23363>, James, Anne and others who'd like to take a look, do you have any other comments on this PR, especially high-level ones about the general approach? This would unblock the following steps and we can address small issues in parallel. 2. If we agree this approach is what we wanted by having consistent and explicit semantics across Python 2 and 3, I'll update the RFC <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/rfcs/pull/49> (essentially swapping the currently "recommended" and "alternative" approaches and filling in some more concrete guidelines), and kick off a new round of RFC process (hopefully relatively quick since many people are already on board with the new approach). 3. Meanwhile, Ziran can start porting more handlers (we can wait until the RFC is accepted to actually merge the PRs). We have hundreds of handlers and we should expect lots of PRs. Reviewing them is a critical task, too. Since we now have concrete guidelines and changes will be largely mechanical, I'm proposing to adopt the "LGTM % nits" convention widely used in Chromium: if a PR largely looks good but has some minor issues, approve the PR with comments. In addition, we'd really appreciate a few more people to sign up for reviewing these changes to share the workload. Anyone volunteering? Best, RobertReceived on Monday, 11 May 2020 22:19:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 11 May 2020 22:19:41 UTC