W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: CSS tests in github/web-platform

From: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:45:19 -0700
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
CC: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>, Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CE736B6F.1A465%rhauck@adobe.com>
Sure, no problem. It's done.


On 10/3/13 6:02 PM, "Tobie Langel" <tobie@w3.org> wrote:

>On Thursday, October 3, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Rebecca Hauck wrote:
>> + public-test-infra
>> 
>> I'm resurrecting this proposal I made (mistakenly, privately) six
>>months ago when we first began to adopt github since Tobie has just
>>proposed the same for the Shenzhen event [1].
>> 
>> Peter, given that we've tried for several events using the github
>>mirror + hg-git bridge and had difficulties, are you willing to
>>reconsider this approach this time?
>As argued in my previous email[1], I think we should list pros and cons
>of the current status quo and those of my/Rebecca's proposal (use the
>main test repo for TestTWF contributions of CSS tests) so we can make an
>informed decision.
>
>Rebecca, you're in the best position to document the downsides of the
>current situation, Peter, you're well positioned to document issues with
>this proposal.
>
>Would you two be willing to do that in the wiki[2] to help us reach a
>resolution on this issue?
>
>Thanks,
>
>--tobie
>
>---
>[1]: 
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-test-infra/2013OctDec/0008.html
>[2]: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Testing/CSS_Tests_on_WPT
> 
>
>
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 01:45:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:34:10 UTC