- From: Rebecca Hauck <rhauck@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:45:19 -0700
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- CC: Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>, Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Sure, no problem. It's done. On 10/3/13 6:02 PM, "Tobie Langel" <tobie@w3.org> wrote: >On Thursday, October 3, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Rebecca Hauck wrote: >> + public-test-infra >> >> I'm resurrecting this proposal I made (mistakenly, privately) six >>months ago when we first began to adopt github since Tobie has just >>proposed the same for the Shenzhen event [1]. >> >> Peter, given that we've tried for several events using the github >>mirror + hg-git bridge and had difficulties, are you willing to >>reconsider this approach this time? >As argued in my previous email[1], I think we should list pros and cons >of the current status quo and those of my/Rebecca's proposal (use the >main test repo for TestTWF contributions of CSS tests) so we can make an >informed decision. > >Rebecca, you're in the best position to document the downsides of the >current situation, Peter, you're well positioned to document issues with >this proposal. > >Would you two be willing to do that in the wiki[2] to help us reach a >resolution on this issue? > >Thanks, > >--tobie > >--- >[1]: >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-test-infra/2013OctDec/0008.html >[2]: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Testing/CSS_Tests_on_WPT > > >
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 01:45:01 UTC