- From: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 18:07:44 +0200
- To: public-test-infra@w3.org
On 08/07/2013 02:20 AM, Peter Linss wrote: > My fundamental point here is that if the test suite can't get a spec > out of CR, then it has little utility to the WG developing the spec, > who, at the end of the day, needs the specs to advance if they want > their charter to get renewed or be able to work on "the next cool > thing". Building an entirely new testing infrastructure that can't > get a spec out of CR is, IMO, a big waste of time, and not something > I'm signing on to help with. Don't get me wrong, I see the value of > testing regardless, but if getting specs past CR isn't a primary > focus of *this* effort, then we have a serious problem. FWIW, it's very much not a focus for me, and I don't see how that's a problem. It may not be of a lot of utility to some WG, but the important part is (IMO) the utility to the interoperability of the platform. HTH Ms2ger
Received on Wednesday, 7 August 2013 16:08:15 UTC