- From: HU, BIN <bh526r@att.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 17:19:38 +0000
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- CC: public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>
Based on all feedback on the list, it seems that we have reached a consensus to consolidate to a single public facing channel. All relevant resources are well documented in testing wiki page. Thanks to everyone for making it happen. Bin -----Original Message----- From: Tobie Langel [mailto:tobie@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 4:51 AM To: James Graham Cc: HU, BIN; public-test-infra Subject: Re: "Help" channels in terms of testing On Monday, June 3, 2013 at 9:25 PM, James Graham wrote: > I think this is the best idea. It is clear that the testing community is > too fractured at the moment; even when decisions are made once they get > explained multiple times; typically once on public-html-testsuite (or in > #htmlt), once on public-webapps-testsuite (or in #webapps). If CSS wasn't > even more of a ghetto we would probably have the same conversations on > public-css-testsuite. I don't even know how people in other WGs like Web > Performance and WebRTC WG are finding out things about testing. Possibly > they aren't. > > Specifically I suggest we drop everything apart from public-test-infra and > #testing. Anything that is truly WG specific should go to the main WG > mailing list. Can't agree more. Pruned the doc to its bare essentials[1]. Compiled those resources in the testing wiki's liaison page[2] for future reference and consolidation. --tobie --- [1]: https://github.com/w3c/ttwf-docs/pull/33 [2]: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Testing/Liaisons
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 17:21:10 UTC