On 05/23/2013 01:28 PM, Andreas Tolf Tolfsen wrote: > On 05/23/2013 01:14 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Good question. I recall this being discussed a bit before but I don't >> believe there was consensus on what to do. >> >> I am indifferent as to what WebApps does, however, it might be useful to >> see what other groups are doing in case we want to leverage prior work >> (or learn about things to avoid). > > A group of us are working on standardizing interactions with browser > with testability in mind. The current editor's draft can be found here: > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webdriver/raw-file/default/webdriver-spec.html > > Since there are already several mature implementations of this > specification we are in a special situation. As far as I can tell, the > only thing missing is work on a test runner/execution environment for > WebDriver based tests. > True, but not really the answer to the current question. As discussed on irc, the de-facto standard is to use a MANIFEST file with manual foo.html to indicate that a test is manual. That works with Mozilla's infrastructure at least and since they seem to be one of very few people actively importing W3C tests it makes sense to use a system that works for them.Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 11:36:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:34:08 UTC