- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:17:01 +0200
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- CC: public-test-infra@w3.org
On 23/05/2013 13:36 , James Graham wrote: > True, but not really the answer to the current question. > > As discussed on irc, the de-facto standard is to use a MANIFEST file with > > manual foo.html > > to indicate that a test is manual. > > That works with Mozilla's infrastructure at least and since they seem to > be one of very few people actively importing W3C tests it makes sense to > use a system that works for them. My alternative proposal was to have manual tests called foo.manual.html, to avoid manifests going out of sync with reality. From there it's easy to generate a manifest automatically if needed. But I'm happy to go with whatever is done by whoever does the work. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 12:17:13 UTC