- From: Linss, Peter <peter.linss@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:29:57 +0000
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- CC: "<public-test-infra@w3.org>" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
On Jun 1, 2012, at 5:22 AM, James Graham wrote: > On 06/01/2012 02:01 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: >> On May 31, 2012, at 16:15 , James Graham wrote: >>>> Overall I agree that the approval step is a bureaucratic speed bump >>>> that is not being helpful. I think that we should move to a >>>> commit-then-review model in which people who have an interest in >>>> passing a test suite can file bugs against broken tests. Ideally, we >>>> would make flagging broken tests easy — I'm thinking about ways of >>>> doing that in the framework (suggestions welcome — I wonder if I >>>> could just add a flag to "reported as broken" test cases). >>> >>> Make it possible to link to bug reports? >> >> Are you thinking of something like<link rel='bug' href='URL of bug report'>? I think that would work for me. >> > > I meant in the metadata. I don't see why you would want to link to a bug about a test inside a test, really. Agreed, you don't want to churn the test unnecessarily. Although the term 'in the metadata' is a bit vague, as some of the metadata about a test _is_stored in the test. Peter
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 13:31:06 UTC