- From: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:22:29 +0200
- To: public-test-infra@w3.org
On 06/01/2012 02:01 PM, Robin Berjon wrote: > On May 31, 2012, at 16:15 , James Graham wrote: >>> Overall I agree that the approval step is a bureaucratic speed bump >>> that is not being helpful. I think that we should move to a >>> commit-then-review model in which people who have an interest in >>> passing a test suite can file bugs against broken tests. Ideally, we >>> would make flagging broken tests easy — I'm thinking about ways of >>> doing that in the framework (suggestions welcome — I wonder if I >>> could just add a flag to "reported as broken" test cases). >> >> Make it possible to link to bug reports? > > Are you thinking of something like<link rel='bug' href='URL of bug report'>? I think that would work for me. > I meant in the metadata. I don't see why you would want to link to a bug about a test inside a test, really.
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 12:25:33 UTC