Great. Thank you!
Simon
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote:
> The steps for taking a draft to FPWD are documented here:
>
> http://goo.gl/bbzqu
>
> The first step really is that the group needs to formally record a
> resolution to proceed to FPWD. That can be done by having the Wilhelm (the
> chair) send out a "Call for Consensus" message to the group, with a
> deadline for comments (usually 1 week). Some recent examples:
>
> CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0784.html
>
> CfC: publish FPWD of Input Method Editor (IME); deadline May 9
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0474.html
>
> Once that deadline has passed, if there are no objections to the FPWD Call
> for Consensus, Wilhelm sends a Transition Request message to plh asking
> linking to the Call for Consensus message and asking for approval of the
> shortname.
>
> I'll work with Wilhelm to get this all started.
>
> --Mike
>
> Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, 2012-05-24 17:04 +0200:
>
> > On 05/24/2012 04:50 PM, Simon Stewart wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >So, according to my understanding, we need to get consensus in this
> group
> > >and approval from the domain lead (Wilhelm, presumably). Is there
> anyone on
> > >this list who doesn't feel we should move to FPWD? I'm all for it.
> >
> > Per <http://www.w3.org/Interaction/>, the domain lead is plh. He will
> need
> > to approve the shortname ("webdriver"?).
> >
> > HTH
> > Ms2ger
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 09:20:37 UTC