- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 18:18:05 +0900
- To: Wilhelm Joys Andersen <w@wja.no>, Simon Stewart <shs@google.com>, David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, public-test-infra@w3.org, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
The steps for taking a draft to FPWD are documented here:
http://goo.gl/bbzqu
The first step really is that the group needs to formally record a
resolution to proceed to FPWD. That can be done by having the Wilhelm (the
chair) send out a "Call for Consensus" message to the group, with a
deadline for comments (usually 1 week). Some recent examples:
CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0784.html
CfC: publish FPWD of Input Method Editor (IME); deadline May 9
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0474.html
Once that deadline has passed, if there are no objections to the FPWD Call
for Consensus, Wilhelm sends a Transition Request message to plh asking
linking to the Call for Consensus message and asking for approval of the
shortname.
I'll work with Wilhelm to get this all started.
--Mike
Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, 2012-05-24 17:04 +0200:
> On 05/24/2012 04:50 PM, Simon Stewart wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >So, according to my understanding, we need to get consensus in this group
> >and approval from the domain lead (Wilhelm, presumably). Is there anyone on
> >this list who doesn't feel we should move to FPWD? I'm all for it.
>
> Per <http://www.w3.org/Interaction/>, the domain lead is plh. He will need
> to approve the shortname ("webdriver"?).
>
> HTH
> Ms2ger
>
>
>
--
Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 09:18:27 UTC