The steps for taking a draft to FPWD are documented here: http://goo.gl/bbzqu The first step really is that the group needs to formally record a resolution to proceed to FPWD. That can be done by having the Wilhelm (the chair) send out a "Call for Consensus" message to the group, with a deadline for comments (usually 1 week). Some recent examples: CfC: publish FPWD of Fullscreen spec; deadline May 24 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0784.html CfC: publish FPWD of Input Method Editor (IME); deadline May 9 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/0474.html Once that deadline has passed, if there are no objections to the FPWD Call for Consensus, Wilhelm sends a Transition Request message to plh asking linking to the Call for Consensus message and asking for approval of the shortname. I'll work with Wilhelm to get this all started. --Mike Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, 2012-05-24 17:04 +0200: > On 05/24/2012 04:50 PM, Simon Stewart wrote: > >Hi, > > > >So, according to my understanding, we need to get consensus in this group > >and approval from the domain lead (Wilhelm, presumably). Is there anyone on > >this list who doesn't feel we should move to FPWD? I'm all for it. > > Per <http://www.w3.org/Interaction/>, the domain lead is plh. He will need > to approve the shortname ("webdriver"?). > > HTH > Ms2ger > > > -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mikeReceived on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 09:18:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:34:08 UTC