- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:50:18 +0100
- To: public-talent-signal@w3.org
- Message-ID: <c77a9ab4-fe9d-73fe-8093-99792f6ba213@pjjk.co.uk>
Joshua, thank you very much for sharing this with the group. I know the amount of work that is going in to the JDX project [1] and recognize that this represents a significant application of schema.org (expanded through reference to HR Open and analysis of use cases) for signaling information about hiring requirements. I would like to direct people's attention to the column in the main table headed "comparison to schema.org". I propose that *this information should factor highly in our prioritization of what specific issues this group addresses***as it represents strong feedback on where the existing terms in schema.org needed to be refined or supplemented in order to meet talent signaling use cases. This is not to say that I think we should just copy every change indicated by this column, there will be some which are specific to the JDX and out of scope for schema.org, and there may be cases where input from this community improves on what JDX have done so far. If the group agrees, I will edit our existing list of issues and use case requirements [2 <https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Issues,_use_cases_and_requirements>] to include the information from that column. So that this document and other relevant work from elsewhere doesn't get buried in our email archive, I have added a page to the wiki on existing and current relevant work [3 <https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Existing_and_current_relevant_work>] with a link. Best regards from a warm and sunny Scotland. Phil 1. I'll remind you all here of my disclosure that I am receiving funding from the US CCF for my work on this group and am also a member of the JDX Data Working Group. 2. https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Issues,_use_cases_and_requirements 3. https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Existing_and_current_relevant_work On 24/07/2019 19:57, Westfall, Joshua wrote: > > Hi Talent Marketplace Signaling Group, > > The U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation has enjoyed being a part of > this community group and the great discussion around the JobPosting > Schema. Therefore, in partnership with HR Open Standards, members of > our Job Data Exchange (JDX) Advisory Committee > <https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/jdx/advisory-board>, and ideas > generated from this group we drafted a few property extensions and > definitions to build off of the current JobPosting Schema (see the > comparison column to the far right of the chart). We plan to pilot > test these ideas that we are calling the “JDX JobSchema+” with 17 > employer partners > <https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/jdx/pilot-partners> over the next > two months. The pilot test will conclude in October with an > independent evaluation of the JDX JobSchema+ from both the demand-side > (i.e., employers) and supply-side (i.e., education, training and > credentialing providers, students and workers) of the talent pipeline. > > We look forward to sharing our findings with the TMS Community Group > later this year. In the meantime, the JDX JobSchema+ proposal > (attached) is open for public feedback on our JDX webpage > <https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/jdx/job-schema> and depending on > our findings and this group’s feedback, maybe a few of these > properties can be considered for Schema.org. > > I look forward to hearing from you and please let me know if you have > any questions or would like to discuss JDX pilot of the JDX JobSchema+ > in more detail. > > Best, > > *Joshua Westfall* > > Senior Manager, Policy & Programs > > U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation > > Center for Education and Workforce > > *O:*202.463.5843 > > *C:*202.845.3820 > > usccf-education-workforce web logo > <http://www.uschamberfoundation.org/center-education-and-workforce> > > uschamberfoundation.org/CEW > <http://www.uschamberfoundation.org/center-education-and-workforce> > > http://image.exct.net/lib/fef01278736102/m/1/USCCFB.gif > <https://www.facebook.com/USCCFeducation>http://image.exct.net/lib/fef01278736102/m/1/USCCTwitter.gif > <https://twitter.com/usccfeducation>linkedin > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-foundation> > -- Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology. PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education. CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090 PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282.
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2019 14:50:47 UTC