- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:03:21 +0100
- To: public-talent-signal@w3.org
- Message-ID: <255e7889-182b-640d-050c-92423be10d42@pjjk.co.uk>
Hello again. I have updated the wiki page for this issue <https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Referring_skills_requirements_to_competency_definitions> [1] with a second example based on Stuarts question about how linked data representations of competences would be handled. I have also opened an issue <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/2322> on schema.org's github issue tracker about this. Phil 1. https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Referring_skills_requirements_to_competency_definitions 2. https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/2322 On 03/07/2019 12:24, Phil Barker wrote: > > Hello all, > > I know that many of you are about start a holiday; and after that I > will be on vacation. So this may not be the best time to start a > conversation, but I want to post this now to see what I come back to... > > One of the issues we have listed is how to refer skills requirements > to competency definitions in a standard framework. > > I have drafted on the wiki a straw man for a simple way of doing this > <https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Example_of_how_to_refer_skills_requirements_to_competency_definitions> > [1] with minimal change to what currently exists in schema.org. It > requires only that the expected type for one property be changed. > > { > "@context":"http://schema.org/", > "@type": "JobPosting", > "title": "Junior software developer", > "skills": { > "@type": "Definedterm", > "termCode": "K0016", > "description": "Knowledge of computer programming principles", > "inDefinedTermSet": { > "@type": "DefinedTermSet", > "name": "National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Cybersecurity Workforce Framework", > "url":"https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-181", > "publisher": { > "@type": "Organization", > "name": "National Institute of Standards and Technology" > }, > "datePublished": "2017-08" > } > } > } > > Points to note / consider > > * this doesn't attempt to fully describe the competency, that's the > job of the framework. Furthermore this approach is pretty much > agnostic to the format used to represent the framework--I mean, it > would be nice if a linked-data friendly format were used and we can > then link properly to its @id but this example is a pdf. > > * is there any other key information that is required to identify the > competence being referred to? > > * I've used the existing schema.org property skills to cover a > competency that is defined as 'knowledge'. I know the KSA approach to > competencies, but also that other aspects can be added > (tools/technologies, attitudes) an other approaches taken. Can we live > with lumping these together under the label skills, or do we have to > look into creating a property with a different name? We will be > somewhat constrained by existing schema.org usage. Also I think that > trying to separate out the different aspects of competence would cause > difficulties when implemented in the non-specialist schema.org > context. Remember, the competence framework is where the information > should be provided about what aspect of competence (knowledge, skill > or ability) is being referred to. > > Best wishes to all celebrating the 4 July. > > Phil > > > 1. > https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Example_of_how_to_refer_skills_requirements_to_competency_definitions > > -- > > Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil > CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for > innovation in education technology. > PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; > information systems for education. > > CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in > England number OC399090 > PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, > number SC569282. > -- Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education technology. PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning; information systems for education. CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in England number OC399090 PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company, number SC569282.
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2019 14:04:01 UTC