- From: Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 15:03:21 +0100
- To: public-talent-signal@w3.org
- Message-ID: <255e7889-182b-640d-050c-92423be10d42@pjjk.co.uk>
Hello again.
I have updated the wiki page for this issue
<https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Referring_skills_requirements_to_competency_definitions>
[1] with a second example based on Stuarts question about how linked
data representations of competences would be handled.
I have also opened an issue
<https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/2322> on schema.org's
github issue tracker about this.
Phil
1.
https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Referring_skills_requirements_to_competency_definitions
2. https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/2322
On 03/07/2019 12:24, Phil Barker wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I know that many of you are about start a holiday; and after that I
> will be on vacation. So this may not be the best time to start a
> conversation, but I want to post this now to see what I come back to...
>
> One of the issues we have listed is how to refer skills requirements
> to competency definitions in a standard framework.
>
> I have drafted on the wiki a straw man for a simple way of doing this
> <https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Example_of_how_to_refer_skills_requirements_to_competency_definitions>
> [1] with minimal change to what currently exists in schema.org. It
> requires only that the expected type for one property be changed.
>
> {
> "@context":"http://schema.org/",
> "@type": "JobPosting",
> "title": "Junior software developer",
> "skills": {
> "@type": "Definedterm",
> "termCode": "K0016",
> "description": "Knowledge of computer programming principles",
> "inDefinedTermSet": {
> "@type": "DefinedTermSet",
> "name": "National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Cybersecurity Workforce Framework",
> "url":"https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-181",
> "publisher": {
> "@type": "Organization",
> "name": "National Institute of Standards and Technology"
> },
> "datePublished": "2017-08"
> }
> }
> }
>
> Points to note / consider
>
> * this doesn't attempt to fully describe the competency, that's the
> job of the framework. Furthermore this approach is pretty much
> agnostic to the format used to represent the framework--I mean, it
> would be nice if a linked-data friendly format were used and we can
> then link properly to its @id but this example is a pdf.
>
> * is there any other key information that is required to identify the
> competence being referred to?
>
> * I've used the existing schema.org property skills to cover a
> competency that is defined as 'knowledge'. I know the KSA approach to
> competencies, but also that other aspects can be added
> (tools/technologies, attitudes) an other approaches taken. Can we live
> with lumping these together under the label skills, or do we have to
> look into creating a property with a different name? We will be
> somewhat constrained by existing schema.org usage. Also I think that
> trying to separate out the different aspects of competence would cause
> difficulties when implemented in the non-specialist schema.org
> context. Remember, the competence framework is where the information
> should be provided about what aspect of competence (knowledge, skill
> or ability) is being referred to.
>
> Best wishes to all celebrating the 4 July.
>
> Phil
>
>
> 1.
> https://www.w3.org/community/talent-signal/wiki/Example_of_how_to_refer_skills_requirements_to_competency_definitions
>
> --
>
> Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
> CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for
> innovation in education technology.
> PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning;
> information systems for education.
>
> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in
> England number OC399090
> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company,
> number SC569282.
>
--
Phil Barker <http://people.pjjk.net/phil>. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
CETIS LLP <https://www.cetis.org.uk>: a cooperative consultancy for
innovation in education technology.
PJJK Limited <https://www.pjjk.co.uk>: technology to enhance learning;
information systems for education.
CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in
England number OC399090
PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company,
number SC569282.
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2019 14:04:01 UTC