[Fwd: new TAG issue: rdfURIMeaning-39]

-----Forwarded Message-----

> From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
> To: www-tag@w3.org, Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
> Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
> Subject: new TAG issue: rdfURIMeaning-39
> Date: 03 Sep 2003 12:57:03 -0500
> 
> 
> In a recent telcon[18Aug], the TAG accepted a new issue on the
> meaning of URIs in RDF documents. The TAG expects to work with
> the Semantic Web Coordination Group and the wider community
> both to clarify the statement of the issue[3Jul] and to work toward
> resolution. The TAG has asked the Semantic Web Coordination
> Group (via yours truely) to help coordinate a meeting of the
> appropriate constituency.
> 
> 
> As a result of a related BOF session at WWW2003 in Budapest,
> there's a new mailing list that I suggest folks use
> to register interest in the issue and discuss it. In particular,
> if you'd like to be involved in scheduling this meeting I'm
> supposed to arrange, please say so there, preferably
> by this Friday.
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sw-meaning/
> 
> DanBri, would you please forward this invitation to the
> RDF Interest Group and the RDF Core Working Group? I'll
> let the WebOnt WG know.
> 
> 
> Please note some of the usual administrative stuff that goes
> with adding an issue to the TAG issues list isn't done. I'm not
> quite sure the number 39 will be allocated for this issue,
> for example.
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
> 
> 
> 
> [18Aug] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Aug/0076.html
>   -> http://www.w3.org/2003/08/18-tagmem-irc
> 
> [3Jul] New issue - Meaning of URIs in RDF documents
> From: Tim Berners-Lee (timbl@w3.org)
> Date: Thu, Jul 03 2003
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0022.html
> 
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> 
-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 17:11:54 UTC