[W3S SysApps]: Application Management (was RE: Life cycle and security model - status)

Thanks for starting this thread Virginie. This is a good discussion.

I also agree that some kind of vision/global architecture would be useful. Furthermore we must dig out which parts to be normatively standardized. Looking into the deprecated(?) http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/runtime/ specification I think that one part is Application Management, http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/runtime/#application-management. There may be some overlap with http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/app-lifecycle/ but I suggest that a separate "Application management for installed web applications" API specification is created based on section 4 in the old runtime specification. 

WDYT?

Claes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
> Sent: den 15 oktober 2013 16:37
> To: public-sysapps@w3.org; GALINDO Virginie
> Subject: Re: Life cycle and security model - status
> 
> Re Virginie's thread:
> 
> [[
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2013Oct/0031.html>
> 
> ...
> 
> Question to the working group is : how do we maintain the knowledge in
> the working group in term of vision, global architecture ? Don't we
> have interest to keep a document like a Note to describe the solution
> we are building with those different pieces of technology ? Or maintain
> the wiki ?
> 
> Sorry if this sounds like a detail while everyone is progressing on the
> technical aspects for the specifications, but if we want people to
> review the WG proposal in the end, we will need to explain what it is.
> ]]
> 
> In the context of the joint meeting between SysApps and WebApps on Nov
> 11 [1] regarding "Manifest", I agree with Virginie that some type of
> vision / architecture document would be useful. If such a document
> exists, please let me know where I can find it.
> 
> (BTW, there's a bit of an implication in Virginie's e-mail the scope
> and/or `plan of record` of this group has changed since it was
> chartered a year ago. If that is true, perhaps it would be useful (to
> this group as well as the broader Web community), if the charter was
> updated to reflect what is "closer to reality"
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/09/sysapps-wg-charter>.)
> 
> -Cheers, ArtB
> 
> [1]
> <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/November2013Meeting#Agenda_Monday_Novem
> ber_11>
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 14:07:18 UTC