Re: CfC: publish FPWD of "app: URI scheme"; deadline April 26th

On Thursday, May 9, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Mandyam, Giridhar wrote:

> Agreed. Thanks,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 9:44 AM
> To: Mandyam, Giridhar
> Cc: Mounir Lamouri; public-sysapps@w3.org (mailto:public-sysapps@w3.org); wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com (mailto:wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com); Dave Raggett
> Subject: Re: CfC: publish FPWD of "app: URI scheme"; deadline April 26th
> 
> On Thursday, May 9, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> I should also add that it should not be a requirement that packaged apps run off the app: URI scheme. The runtime spec should RECOMMEND it. That should address Giri's concerns and give more freedom of choice if implementers want to use something else (e.g., a local http server per application). Again, all that matters is that the results are predictable and interoperable, not that app:// is used. 
> 



I've filed a bug on the manifest spec: 
https://github.com/sysapps/manifest/issues/38

Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 17:24:24 UTC