- From: Kostiainen, Anssi <anssi.kostiainen@intel.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:51:56 +0000
- To: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
On Aug 23, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> wrote: > I was imagining something less complex but we could try that. I am open > to suggestion and I am planning to discuss this during the F2F, that is > why there is a fair amount of time during the meetings to setup the group. > > My initial idea was to split the participants in some groups based on > interests. For example, one group could be about Messaging and > Telephony. Another about Raw Sockets and Task Scheduler. We don't have > to go over every single specifications. It could be more groups but it > should not be more than three I think. It might be a bit too noisy and > chaotic otherwise. Ok. I'll send a separate mail with a proposal for the topic soon. >> It seems we have relatively little time (2h45min) scheduled for the Runtime/Security/Packaged apps discussion considering the scope and importance of the work. > > That was actually a typo. I meant to work on runtime until 1pm, not > noon. We should work on this over 3h. Is that better? (Less than 3h45 > because we will secure some time for Device Capabilities.) Yes, that's better. Thanks! -Anssi
Received on Friday, 23 August 2013 17:52:25 UTC