Re: Reviewing our issues

Stirring up participation with a bikeshedding naming issue, I see what you did there… well played (grin).

More seriously, +1 to using GitHub directly. Possibly with an email reminder from time to time for pressing issues which lack any comments.

Best,
Romain.



> On 10 Oct 2019, at 23:03, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I plan to work in the coming days and weeks on resolving the remaining issues in our tracker, and cleaning up the draft reports. 
> 
> I’d also like to engage the CG more as I do this work. Does it work best to discuss the issues on this list, or would it be preferable to use the github tracker directly?
> 
> Here’s the first issue. It’s a relatively easy one, I think:
> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24 <https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24>
> 
> Thanks
> Marisa
> 

Received on Friday, 11 October 2019 08:30:20 UTC