Yep, that was the idea! And I see that it worked - thanks for chiming in. And now for something completely different — I won’t call it baseurl but … https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/26 <https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/26> Marisa > On Oct 11, 2019, at 01:30, Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com> wrote: > > Stirring up participation with a bikeshedding naming issue, I see what you did there… well played (grin). > > More seriously, +1 to using GitHub directly. Possibly with an email reminder from time to time for pressing issues which lack any comments. > > Best, > Romain. > > > >> On 10 Oct 2019, at 23:03, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com <mailto:marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I plan to work in the coming days and weeks on resolving the remaining issues in our tracker, and cleaning up the draft reports. >> >> I’d also like to engage the CG more as I do this work. Does it work best to discuss the issues on this list, or would it be preferable to use the github tracker directly? >> >> Here’s the first issue. It’s a relatively easy one, I think: >> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24 <https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24> >> >> Thanks >> Marisa >> >
Received on Friday, 11 October 2019 22:07:18 UTC