Re: Reviewing our issues

Thanks to everyone who shared their thoughts - the results are:

1. Synchronized Narration: 6 votes
2. Synchronized Media: 3 votes
3. Synchronized Accessible Media: 1 vote (from me)

1. Include “for Publications”: 1 (or maybe 2) votes
2. Don’t include “for Publications”: 5 votes

So (drum roll) - our report will be called “Synchronized Narration” 🎉 Which pretty much matches the language currently in use (I was testing it out), so that’s nice. 

Thanks again for your participation.

Marisa

> On Nov 25, 2019, at 13:12, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> One more vote for “Synchronized Narration” - 
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> From: "Rasmussen, Lloyd" <lras@loc.gov <mailto:lras@loc.gov>>
>> Subject: RE: Reviewing our issues
>> Date: November 15, 2019 at 13:31:37 PST
>> To: Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com <mailto:marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>>
>> 
>> I vote for “Synchronized Narration.”
>>  
>> Lloyd Rasmussen, Senior Staff Engineer
>> National Library Service for the Blind and Print Disabled
>> Library of Congress, Washington, DC 20542
>> 202-707-0535     https://nls.loc.gov <https://nls.loc.gov/>
>> The preceding opinions are my own and not necessarily those of the Library of Congress, NLS.
>>  
>> From: Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com <mailto:marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 4:14 PM
>> To: W3C Synchronized Multimedia for Publications CG <public-sync-media-pub@w3.org <mailto:public-sync-media-pub@w3.org>>
>> Subject: Re: Reviewing our issues
>>  
>> Ok, let’s try this again - issue #24 is about naming. We should pick a name because audiobooks is likely going to CR, and our note is referenced by that spec. I do understand that as a CG note, we can rename our document with little consequence, but as we will be referenced informatively by a rec track document, it would be really nice to choose now and stick with it.
>>  
>> Based on this issue: 
>> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24 <https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24>
>>  
>> I see these options:
>>  
>> Synchronized Media 
>> Synchronized Narration
>> Synchronized Alternative Media
>>  
>> Any of them could be appended with “for Publications”.
>>  
>> Let’s vote. Please indicate:
>>  
>> 1. Which of the three choices you like the most. 
>> 2. Whether you prefer to append with “for Publications” or not 
>>  
>> We don’t need new ideas or other variations at this point. We’re a small group, so your one vote could change everything!! Voting closes by the end of this week (Nov 15 end of day in California).
>>  
>> Thanks
>> Marisa
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 11, 2019, at 15:07, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com <mailto:marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>  
>> Yep, that was the idea! And I see that it worked - thanks for chiming in.
>>  
>> And now for something completely different — I won’t call it baseurl but … 
>> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/26 <https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/26>
>>  
>> Marisa
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 11, 2019, at 01:30, Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com <mailto:rdeltour@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>  
>> Stirring up participation with a bikeshedding naming issue, I see what you did there… well played (grin).
>>  
>> More seriously, +1 to using GitHub directly. Possibly with an email reminder from time to time for pressing issues which lack any comments.
>>  
>> Best,
>> Romain.
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> On 10 Oct 2019, at 23:03, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com <mailto:marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>  
>> Hi all,
>>  
>> I plan to work in the coming days and weeks on resolving the remaining issues in our tracker, and cleaning up the draft reports. 
>>  
>> I’d also like to engage the CG more as I do this work. Does it work best to discuss the issues on this list, or would it be preferable to use the github tracker directly?
>>  
>> Here’s the first issue. It’s a relatively easy one, I think:
>> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24 <https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24>
>>  
>> Thanks
>> Marisa
>