Fwd: Reviewing our issues

One more vote for “Synchronized Narration” - 

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "Rasmussen, Lloyd" <lras@loc.gov>
> Subject: RE: Reviewing our issues
> Date: November 15, 2019 at 13:31:37 PST
> To: Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>
> 
> I vote for “Synchronized Narration.”
>  
> Lloyd Rasmussen, Senior Staff Engineer
> National Library Service for the Blind and Print Disabled
> Library of Congress, Washington, DC 20542
> 202-707-0535     https://nls.loc.gov <https://nls.loc.gov/>
> The preceding opinions are my own and not necessarily those of the Library of Congress, NLS.
>  
> From: Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com> 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 4:14 PM
> To: W3C Synchronized Multimedia for Publications CG <public-sync-media-pub@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Reviewing our issues
>  
> Ok, let’s try this again - issue #24 is about naming. We should pick a name because audiobooks is likely going to CR, and our note is referenced by that spec. I do understand that as a CG note, we can rename our document with little consequence, but as we will be referenced informatively by a rec track document, it would be really nice to choose now and stick with it.
>  
> Based on this issue: 
> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24 <https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24>
>  
> I see these options:
>  
> Synchronized Media 
> Synchronized Narration
> Synchronized Alternative Media
>  
> Any of them could be appended with “for Publications”.
>  
> Let’s vote. Please indicate:
>  
> 1. Which of the three choices you like the most. 
> 2. Whether you prefer to append with “for Publications” or not 
>  
> We don’t need new ideas or other variations at this point. We’re a small group, so your one vote could change everything!! Voting closes by the end of this week (Nov 15 end of day in California).
>  
> Thanks
> Marisa
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 15:07, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com <mailto:marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>> wrote:
>  
> Yep, that was the idea! And I see that it worked - thanks for chiming in.
>  
> And now for something completely different — I won’t call it baseurl but … 
> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/26 <https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/26>
>  
> Marisa
>  
>  
> 
> 
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 01:30, Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com <mailto:rdeltour@gmail.com>> wrote:
>  
> Stirring up participation with a bikeshedding naming issue, I see what you did there… well played (grin).
>  
> More seriously, +1 to using GitHub directly. Possibly with an email reminder from time to time for pressing issues which lack any comments.
>  
> Best,
> Romain.
>  
>  
> 
> 
> On 10 Oct 2019, at 23:03, Marisa DeMeglio <marisa.demeglio@gmail.com <mailto:marisa.demeglio@gmail.com>> wrote:
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> I plan to work in the coming days and weeks on resolving the remaining issues in our tracker, and cleaning up the draft reports. 
>  
> I’d also like to engage the CG more as I do this work. Does it work best to discuss the issues on this list, or would it be preferable to use the github tracker directly?
>  
> Here’s the first issue. It’s a relatively easy one, I think:
> https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24 <https://github.com/w3c/sync-media-pub/issues/24>
>  
> Thanks
> Marisa