- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:17:01 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
On Mar 29, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > I was looking at the OWL-S examples, and I'm pretty > sure I found a bug in > http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/CongoProcess.owl > > > 465 <process:hasInput> > 466 <process:Input rdf:ID="CongoBuyBookCreditCardNumber"> > 467 <process:parameterType rdf:resource="#&xsd;#string"/> > 468 </process:Input> > 469 </process:hasInput> > > I'm pretty sure that should be: > > 467 <process:parameterType rdf:resource="&xsd;#string"/> Sure looks like. > Hmm... after I fixed that, I'm still having trouble. This > isn't rdf-grammatical: > > 342 <process:Sequence> > 343 <process:components rdf:parseType="Collection"> > 344 <process:AtomicProcess > rdf:resource="#LocateBook"/> > 345 > <process:CompositeProcess rdf:resource="#CongoBuyBook"/> > 346 </process:components> > 347 </process:Sequence> > > I'm not sure what you meant. Pretty sure it's meant to be s/rdf;resource/rdf:about/ > If anybody has tools that work on OWL-S documents and some > OWL-S documents they work on, please point me/us at them. http://www.mindswap.org/2004/owl-s/api/ Java based API. I'll get some of our examples posted there sometime today. Cheers, Bijan Parsia.
Received on Monday, 29 March 2004 10:18:14 UTC