- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:10:52 -0600
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
I was looking at the OWL-S examples, and I'm pretty sure I found a bug in http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/CongoProcess.owl 465 <process:hasInput> 466 <process:Input rdf:ID="CongoBuyBookCreditCardNumber"> 467 <process:parameterType rdf:resource="#&xsd;#string"/> 468 </process:Input> 469 </process:hasInput> I'm pretty sure that should be: 467 <process:parameterType rdf:resource="&xsd;#string"/> Hmm... after I fixed that, I'm still having trouble. This isn't rdf-grammatical: 342 <process:Sequence> 343 <process:components rdf:parseType="Collection"> 344 <process:AtomicProcess rdf:resource="#LocateBook"/> 345 <process:CompositeProcess rdf:resource="#CongoBuyBook"/> 346 </process:components> 347 </process:Sequence> I'm not sure what you meant. If anybody has tools that work on OWL-S documents and some OWL-S documents they work on, please point me/us at them. fyi, notes: http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2004/03/29/2004-03-29.html#1080571300.985747 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Monday, 29 March 2004 10:10:46 UTC