Re: problems parsing CongoProcess.owl

Thanks, Dan, for this feedback.  It turns out these syntax errors have 
already been corrected in our working files for the next release.  So 
I've just copied those corrections into the current release.

another comments below ...

Bijan Parsia wrote:

> 
> On Mar 29, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
>>
>> I was looking at the OWL-S examples, and I'm pretty
>> sure I found a bug in
>> http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/CongoProcess.owl
>>
>>
>>    465    <process:hasInput>
>>    466      <process:Input rdf:ID="CongoBuyBookCreditCardNumber">
>>    467        <process:parameterType rdf:resource="#&xsd;#string"/>
>>    468      </process:Input>
>>    469    </process:hasInput>
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that should be:
>>
>>    467        <process:parameterType rdf:resource="&xsd;#string"/>
> 
> 
> Sure looks like.
> 
>> Hmm... after I fixed that, I'm still having trouble. This
>> isn't rdf-grammatical:
>>
>>    342      <process:Sequence>
>>    343        <process:components rdf:parseType="Collection">
>>    344                                          <process:AtomicProcess
>> rdf:resource="#LocateBook"/>
>>    345
>> <process:CompositeProcess rdf:resource="#CongoBuyBook"/>
>>    346        </process:components>
>>    347      </process:Sequence>
>>
>> I'm not sure what you meant.
> 
> 
> Pretty sure it's meant to be s/rdf;resource/rdf:about/
> 
>> If anybody has tools that work on OWL-S documents and some
>> OWL-S documents they work on, please point me/us at them.
> 
> 
>     http://www.mindswap.org/2004/owl-s/api/
> 
> Java based API.
> 
> I'll get some of our examples posted there sometime today.

There are a few other things mentioned here:

   http://www.daml.org/services/tools.html

(But this list isn't necessarily complete or up-to-date, I'm afraid.)

Regards,
David Martin

Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2004 02:32:27 UTC