- From: Austin Tate <a.tate@ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:09:42 +0000
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
We want to be careful about adding many attributes for annotations...much like we want to try to cluster the various attributes of OWL-S into more fundamental classes of things. I suggest that all annotations in OWL-S are clustered into a single "annotation" type that we can then sub-class into desirable sets of different notations with different types or properties. So all textural/string attributes can be clustered and it can be understood when some are related to others - e.g. different language variants of a textual description or tooltip. I suggest that all annotations are of form key=value where arbitrarily complex values are allows... and (but this is less obvious) I think reasonably complex keys might be useful... not restricted to some simple symbol name. Austin
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 11:09:51 UTC