- From: <Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:24:05 +0200
- To: davy.vermeir@vub.ac.be
- Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Received on Monday, 12 April 2004 05:24:13 UTC
hi Davy, > If I document this using OWL-S, should I create two atomic processes > and combine them into a composite process using the choice-element ? > And what about the profile then ? > Or is there another solution ? > I would say that's the beauty of semantic web annotation: you can mark up only those things you want the semantic web agents to be aware of / deal with. You can annotate both operations, but it does not matter if you leave one out if it is not useful to your agents. And you are always free to split up your markups and distribute them over several OWL-S annotations (all pointing to the same WSDL file). And certainly there is no need to artificially create a composite process where it does not exist conceptually. In case of your example, i would just create two atomic processes but no composite process. This should provide sufficient information to agents (or matchmakers) to pick the operation they are looking for. greetings, Joachim
Received on Monday, 12 April 2004 05:24:13 UTC