- From: Davy Vermeir <davermei@vub.ac.be>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:20:09 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch
- Cc: davy.vermeir@vub.ac.be, public-sws-ig@w3.org
Hi, thank you for replying > And certainly there is no need to artificially create a composite process > where it does not exist conceptually. In case of your example, i would just > create two atomic processes but no composite process. This should provide > sufficient information to agents (or matchmakers) to pick the operation > they are looking for. I agree that you can create only two atomic processes A and B, but looking at the specifications of the OWL-S process, a ProcessModel can have at most 1 process. So either you choose 1 of the two, or you create an extra composite choice component. > > greetings, > Joachim
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2004 07:20:44 UTC