- From: Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:40:31 -0400
- To: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>
- Cc: "public-swisig@w3.org" <public-swisig@w3.org>
I have created the LinkedIn Group here: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=8142655 On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com> wrote: > I have created the LinkedIn Group here. > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: >> Marco >> >> two quicks >> >> - members are encouraged to co- lead by taking initiative >> if you think something is beneficial, please do it :-) >> (I have limited capacity, will consider your suggestion when I have a >> mo) >> - increasing exposure is good, but, how to increase the activity/exchanges >> withing >> the group? do you think a linkedin group and g+ will make us more >> productive/collaborative? >> >> I ll work on the next round of inputs from members soon, hoping that people >> will commit >> to at least something :-) >> >> I take the opportunity to thank again Roberto, Martin, Heiko and other for >> taking the lead on respective actions, and hope others will follow >> >> cheers >> >> PDM >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Yes I would think that it adds value as it increases visibility and >>> allows people to connect, same would apply to reference on g+ . >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Marco >>> > hadnt thought about a linked in group, because havent thought about how >>> > it >>> > can add value to the community (not many posts here, would people post >>> > there?) >>> > - members can add affiliation to their portfolios without the linnked >>> > in >>> > group, no? >>> > >>> > but if useful we can quickly launch one, and if its not used >>> > we can always delete it later. >>> > >>> > I ll do it when I have a mo, if nobody has done it by then >>> > cheers >>> > P >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marco Neumann >>> > <marco.neumann@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> did you already create a "W3C Semantic Web Interfaces Community" >>> >> LinkedIn >>> >> group? >>> >> >>> >> it would help raise visibility and allows members to add this >>> >> affiliation to their portfolio. >>> >> >>> >> Marco >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Paola Di Maio >>> >> <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > 41 members, mostly quiet, but active in the background >>> >> > (doing things without much discussion) >>> >> > >>> >> > not bad, but what can we create together? >>> >> > >>> >> > I was trying to make the stakeholder survey mandatory for everyone >>> >> > who >>> >> > joins, but >>> >> > we do not have a way to implement this yet, so please kindly take a >>> >> > minute >>> >> > to give >>> >> > input when joining, or whenever you have a minute >>> >> > >>> >> > Here is the (old) form where members can still give input >>> >> > >>> >> > Input your preferences on the online form >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc6MQ#gid=0 >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > responses >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0ApXeDqbLLqHSdDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc&rm=full#gid=0 >>> >> > >>> >> > NEXT SURVEY >>> >> > - we could drill a bit more into the group to find out things like >>> >> > >>> >> > geographical location of members (to support the planning of >>> >> > face to face activities) and field of practice (academia, industry >>> >> > etc) >>> >> > >>> >> > what else should be useful to know about the group's members? >>> >> > please suggest any questions you may have under this thread, so that >>> >> > they >>> >> > can be included in the survey- >>> >> > >>> >> > Also, please help to shape a charter. Should we aim to have a nice >>> >> > workable >>> >> > collectively shaped charter >>> >> > before the end of the year? >>> >> > >>> >> > At the moment we have a stub >>> >> > http://www.w3.org/community/swisig/wiki/Main_Page >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > someone suggested the charter should contain the following headings >>> >> > >>> >> > 1. community goals >>> >> > 2. proposed activities/timeframes >>> >> > 3. governance/rules >>> >> > >>> >> > anything else? >>> >> > >>> >> > will send another link to 2014 survey with additional >>> >> > questions/soliciting >>> >> > inputs for the charter soon >>> >> > >>> >> > please start thinking >>> >> > >>> >> > cheerios >>> >> > >>> >> > PDM >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> --- >>> >> Marco Neumann >>> >> KONA >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> --- >>> Marco Neumann >>> KONA >> >> > > > > -- > > > --- > Marco Neumann > KONA -- --- Marco Neumann KONA
Received on Saturday, 26 July 2014 12:41:09 UTC