- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:40:35 +0545
- To: Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com>
- Cc: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>, "public-swisig@w3.org" <public-swisig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SoYgD=csD07rqt+FEpgcizYpnsyJ3eVEuKxc57oPZc5Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks a lot Marco Let's join!! pdm On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com> wrote: > I have created the LinkedIn Group here: > > https://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=8142655 > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I have created the LinkedIn Group here. > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Marco > >> > >> two quicks > >> > >> - members are encouraged to co- lead by taking initiative > >> if you think something is beneficial, please do it :-) > >> (I have limited capacity, will consider your suggestion when I have a > >> mo) > >> - increasing exposure is good, but, how to increase the > activity/exchanges > >> withing > >> the group? do you think a linkedin group and g+ will make us more > >> productive/collaborative? > >> > >> I ll work on the next round of inputs from members soon, hoping that > people > >> will commit > >> to at least something :-) > >> > >> I take the opportunity to thank again Roberto, Martin, Heiko and other > for > >> taking the lead on respective actions, and hope others will follow > >> > >> cheers > >> > >> PDM > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Yes I would think that it adds value as it increases visibility and > >>> allows people to connect, same would apply to reference on g+ . > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Paola Di Maio < > paola.dimaio@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Marco > >>> > hadnt thought about a linked in group, because havent thought about > how > >>> > it > >>> > can add value to the community (not many posts here, would people > post > >>> > there?) > >>> > - members can add affiliation to their portfolios without the > linnked > >>> > in > >>> > group, no? > >>> > > >>> > but if useful we can quickly launch one, and if its not used > >>> > we can always delete it later. > >>> > > >>> > I ll do it when I have a mo, if nobody has done it by then > >>> > cheers > >>> > P > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marco Neumann > >>> > <marco.neumann@gmail.com> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> did you already create a "W3C Semantic Web Interfaces Community" > >>> >> LinkedIn > >>> >> group? > >>> >> > >>> >> it would help raise visibility and allows members to add this > >>> >> affiliation to their portfolio. > >>> >> > >>> >> Marco > >>> >> > >>> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Paola Di Maio > >>> >> <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> > 41 members, mostly quiet, but active in the background > >>> >> > (doing things without much discussion) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > not bad, but what can we create together? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > I was trying to make the stakeholder survey mandatory for everyone > >>> >> > who > >>> >> > joins, but > >>> >> > we do not have a way to implement this yet, so please kindly take > a > >>> >> > minute > >>> >> > to give > >>> >> > input when joining, or whenever you have a minute > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Here is the (old) form where members can still give input > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Input your preferences on the online form > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc6MQ#gid=0 > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > responses > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0ApXeDqbLLqHSdDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc&rm=full#gid=0 > >>> >> > > >>> >> > NEXT SURVEY > >>> >> > - we could drill a bit more into the group to find out things like > >>> >> > > >>> >> > geographical location of members (to support the planning of > >>> >> > face to face activities) and field of practice (academia, industry > >>> >> > etc) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > what else should be useful to know about the group's members? > >>> >> > please suggest any questions you may have under this thread, so > that > >>> >> > they > >>> >> > can be included in the survey- > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Also, please help to shape a charter. Should we aim to have a > nice > >>> >> > workable > >>> >> > collectively shaped charter > >>> >> > before the end of the year? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > At the moment we have a stub > >>> >> > http://www.w3.org/community/swisig/wiki/Main_Page > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > someone suggested the charter should contain the following > headings > >>> >> > > >>> >> > 1. community goals > >>> >> > 2. proposed activities/timeframes > >>> >> > 3. governance/rules > >>> >> > > >>> >> > anything else? > >>> >> > > >>> >> > will send another link to 2014 survey with additional > >>> >> > questions/soliciting > >>> >> > inputs for the charter soon > >>> >> > > >>> >> > please start thinking > >>> >> > > >>> >> > cheerios > >>> >> > > >>> >> > PDM > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> --- > >>> >> Marco Neumann > >>> >> KONA > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> > >>> --- > >>> Marco Neumann > >>> KONA > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > --- > > Marco Neumann > > KONA > > > > -- > > > --- > Marco Neumann > KONA >
Received on Saturday, 26 July 2014 12:56:02 UTC