Re: quick look at membership, and proposed clause for this group's charter

Marco

so far we have 35 ppl on the list, should be visible to all from the
community home page
and we are all community members,

myself being chair
mostly because i started the group, and Martin being co-chair because he
volunteered by filling out this form

Input your preferences on the online form

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc6MQ#gid=0

VIEW THE INFO INPUTTED BY OTHER MEMBERS HERE
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0ApXeDqbLLqHSdDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc&rm=full#gid=0


other people may become available to chair/cochair in the future, please
fill out the form and we ll  rotate

please let us know if you think we should structure membership differently,
and/or if you
 have any other suggestions for the group

here's a draft  to share notes

Community working document
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NBbtEnN2bvf5pbx8lpNNydBClJwezyxIVSkmOI5AvU4/edit



P


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com>wrote:

> How many "members" are the now?
>
> What constitutes a member and how does the status relate to non-members?
>
> Best,
> Marco
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks, Lars
> > we are all lurkers in some lists, and more active in others
> >
> > that is inevitable as we try to follow even just notionally what is
> going on
> > everywhere else with limited human and computer level bandwidth
> >
> > as you know, establishing a good balance so that people do not feel too
> much
> > pressure
> > and yet find ways of participating is a challenge for most communities,
> >
> > so far nobody has protested about these clauses, so we are going ahead
> with
> > two rules
> > 1. every member should take the stakeholoder questionnaire
> > (feel free to help improve it)
> > 2. every member should make at least one contribution per semester
> > of whatever weight/importance they see fit (as long as we hear from them)
> > and
> > ping the list about it, so that we can harvest these activities for our
> > reports
> >
> > have not yet found out how to make these rules effective as a charter
> > on the group's page, anyone has any suggestions?
> >
> > we have not yet discussed/decided what we do with defection,
> > but we can think about it later
> >
> > I take this opportunity to welcome new members who have joined
> > since last week and remind everyone that the questionnaire needs to be
> > ticked to maintain good standing
> >
> >  original post 'Vision, Mission and Charter '
> > http://www.w3.org/community/swisig/2014/02/04/vision-missionn-charter/
> >
> > notes in our preliminary report (currently being drafted)
> > http://tinyurl.com/qbv5pfj
> >
> > Please help to shape the vision and mission for the group by taking a
> very
> > quick
> >  questionnaire.(less than 10 questions).  This will help us with
> stakeholder
> > profiling
> > http://tinyurl.com/npurmtg
> >
> > This is only or internal use - Anonymized answers will be shared [...]
> >
> > PDM
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Paola, all,
> >>
> >> > 2. members must commit to a minimum level of contribution to the
> group's
> >> > work
> >> >  (this can be leading pr contributing to a discussion, participate in
> >> > some
> >> > activity from the group's schedule, , writing a blog post or anything
> >> > else
> >> > they consider relevant), to discourage long term silent lurkers
> >> >
> >> > Please let us know if anyone has strong objections to the clause or
> >> > other
> >> > suggestions
> >> > to increase members activities and participation
> >>
> >> I violently agree with the clause. Being a lurker myself, I know that
> >> those kinds of clauses are sometimes necessary to get yourself going.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Lars
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---
> Marco Neumann
> KONA
>