Re: Implementing Federation, Part I

On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 2:29 AM aschrijver <facilitator@humanetech.community>
wrote:

> I might add to this that on Codeberg the organisation
> https://codeberg.org/fediverse is affiliated to SocialHub already, and
> hosts the FEP Process. The SocialCG might be mirrored here, or even finds
> its home on Codeberg.
>

I totally agree with you, re Github vs Codeberg. I'd certainly prefer the
latter, but I also recognize the sunk costs the community has in adopting
GH.
And like you said, just mirroring SocialCG's github to Codeberg would be a
great first step!


> That would be in line also with the 3-stage Standards Process that I am
> much in favor of to guarantee an open and decentralized ecosystem for the
> Fediverse.  See:
> https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/3-stage-standards-process-guaranteeing-an-open-and-decentralized-ecosystem/3602
>
> TL;DR this process is: Ecosystem --> FEP/SocialHub --> W3C SocialCG/WG
>
> Despite the proposal being 3 months old, receiving positive reactions by
> multiple representatives of the SocialCG it hasn't been addressed here.
> Something I also mentioned in a recent reply:
> https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/3-stage-standards-process-guaranteeing-an-open-and-decentralized-ecosystem/3602/30?u=aschrijver


What do you mean by "hasn't been addressed here"? I personally think all
the points you made there are very valid, and pretty much self-evident.
What sort of thing would you like to see, in terms of addressing?