- From: Johannes Ernst <johannes.ernst@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 19:58:12 -0700
- To: public-swicg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <9D60B9D9-51BC-4BB3-BEE9-A37EED216046@gmail.com>
Could somebody enlighten me, I simply don’t know … (and I suspect many other people here don’t know either) How does the W3C usually deal with developer-focused, well-maintained automated test suites for its protocols? Specifically: * who decides what tests are in and which are out? Or really decide on anything related to the test code. * who gets to commit changes to test suites? * where do the resources come from to maintain such test suites? What’s an example for a W3C standard where a complex test suite is maintained very well and entirely under control of the W3C? What I mean by that is that committers — and individual commits -- to such a test suite could be removed if the powers-that-are (say W3C board off directors and hierarchy below) were to decide they wanted to do that. What happens if conflicts occur? (This being humanity, I suspect there are.) Are there examples anybody can share? Thanks, Johannes. Johannes Ernst Fediforum <https://fediforum.org/> Dazzle <https://dazzle.town/>
Received on Thursday, 21 September 2023 02:58:30 UTC