Re: First 2023 SWICG meeting call on Fri May 19

pá 19. 5. 2023 v 6:51 odesílatel Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us> napsal:

> Dmitri,
> On the question of SWICG meeting frequency, I strongly urge the adoption
> of bi-weekly meetings until such time that we see clear evidence that
> meetings are less needed than they clearly are today..
>

For the record, the initial W3C Social Web Incubator Group had weekly
meetings for a duration iirc ~2 years, aiming to draft a final report and
establish the charter for the Working Group. As far as I'm aware, I was the
only participant in each of these calls, and a weekly commitment can be
quite challenging.

It might be beneficial to conduct a straw poll among the attendees to
identify their preferred areas of focus— whether that's addressing bug
fixes and errata or venturing into new tasks.

Considering the relatively limited progress made in resolving bugs over the
past seven years, I personally would lean towards pursuing new work items.

It would be useful to gauge where everyone would like to invest their
efforts.


>
> bob wyman
>
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:26 AM Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Updated proposed agenda for tomorrow's call:
>> https://hack.allmende.io/O4oJiXvyRjWjSS0jlPE6cg
>>
>> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:56 PM Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Finding a regular meeting time slot that works with everyone continues
>>> to be an impossible task.
>>>
>>> In the interest of getting momentum going, we'll be having our first
>>> SWICG call of the year this coming Friday, May 19, at 9 am EST / 6 am
>>> Pacific / 3 pm CET over at:
>>>
>>> https://meet.jit.si/social-web-cg
>>>
>>> Apologies in advance to those who can't make it, let's continue the
>>> discussion on what we can do to accommodate more people (perhaps alternate
>>> biweekly calls, one on Fri and one on Saturday, etc).
>>>
>>> AGENDA:
>>>
>>> 1) (NON-AGENDA item) Although the common first call agenda tradition is
>>> introductions, I'm wondering if we can shortcut the introduction process by
>>> doing it elsewhere, such as on the SWICG mailing list, or SocialHub forum.
>>> Otherwise there's a good chance that we'll take up the whole call with
>>> intros. :)
>>>
>>> 2) Overview of the W3C Community Group process (code of conduct,
>>> governance, etc) to refresh our memories.
>>>
>>> 3) Discussion and proposals for:
>>>
>>> * What are the goals and current focus of SWICG
>>>
>>> * What is SWICG's relationship with the other centers of community and
>>> discussion, such as SocialHub https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/,
>>> Fediverse Enhancement Proposals (FEP) https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep,
>>> the Fedidevs Matrix chat rooms. (My view on this: We can all work together
>>> with those communities, without co-opting or interference.)
>>>
>>> * Governance process for adopting Work Items. (For a good example of an
>>> existing effective Work Item Process, see the Credential Community Group's
>>> process doc: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/workitem-process/ )
>>>
>>> 4) Other discussion as time allows.
>>>
>>> Thank you, talk to you soon.
>>>
>>> Dmitri
>>>
>>