Re: First 2023 SWICG meeting call on Fri May 19

Dmitri,
On the question of SWICG meeting frequency, I strongly urge the adoption of
bi-weekly meetings until such time that we see clear evidence that meetings
are less needed than they clearly are today..

bob wyman


On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:26 AM Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Updated proposed agenda for tomorrow's call:
> https://hack.allmende.io/O4oJiXvyRjWjSS0jlPE6cg
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:56 PM Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Finding a regular meeting time slot that works with everyone continues to
>> be an impossible task.
>>
>> In the interest of getting momentum going, we'll be having our first
>> SWICG call of the year this coming Friday, May 19, at 9 am EST / 6 am
>> Pacific / 3 pm CET over at:
>>
>> https://meet.jit.si/social-web-cg
>>
>> Apologies in advance to those who can't make it, let's continue the
>> discussion on what we can do to accommodate more people (perhaps alternate
>> biweekly calls, one on Fri and one on Saturday, etc).
>>
>> AGENDA:
>>
>> 1) (NON-AGENDA item) Although the common first call agenda tradition is
>> introductions, I'm wondering if we can shortcut the introduction process by
>> doing it elsewhere, such as on the SWICG mailing list, or SocialHub forum.
>> Otherwise there's a good chance that we'll take up the whole call with
>> intros. :)
>>
>> 2) Overview of the W3C Community Group process (code of conduct,
>> governance, etc) to refresh our memories.
>>
>> 3) Discussion and proposals for:
>>
>> * What are the goals and current focus of SWICG
>>
>> * What is SWICG's relationship with the other centers of community and
>> discussion, such as SocialHub https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/,
>> Fediverse Enhancement Proposals (FEP) https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep,
>> the Fedidevs Matrix chat rooms. (My view on this: We can all work together
>> with those communities, without co-opting or interference.)
>>
>> * Governance process for adopting Work Items. (For a good example of an
>> existing effective Work Item Process, see the Credential Community Group's
>> process doc: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/workitem-process/ )
>>
>> 4) Other discussion as time allows.
>>
>> Thank you, talk to you soon.
>>
>> Dmitri
>>
>