- From: The Stag <magicspass@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 12:34:11 -0600
- To: public-swicg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAHox93etq27XOHJ+15KUE3ZiJvL7J5y8s5wJrq30qG9gh4j+QQ@mail.gmail.com>
We should be using 360 degree transparent accounting with as real time as possible. However I've so far only found one bank in the world that offers the feature of transparent records for non profit organizations. If the payment portal updates data when posting confirmation all inbound can be realtime within minutes as long as admin does the job of managing the social engineering. Stripped of identifiers only classifications with blockchained records, social can become the center of humanity. Because people will voluntarily side with those who they trust the most. I believe that is what Elon is up to.... I would be if I was him. Town square turns into decentralized people's assemblies distributing the benefits of AI among itself. You could make a 3 dollar bill meme out of it... I'll do that this afternoon. The only thing is that, as much as we laugh at the jesters, I believe we are all here because we can't excuse the injustice. So I think it should be full transparency with direct democratic voting on expenses, to prove it's not a government extension to as many nations as possible. Because we need to cooperate to avoid climate change forcing far greater situations. Humanity wants it, I rather we did it instead of the tycoons. Especially those of us at his for decades. If I am not mistaken there is no other alternative if the software is built to be the sustainable communications backbone for interplanetary settlements. We could use it to start transparent communities around the National Space Robotics, Engineering, Sciences, etc with it to start off as a multinational exhibition between continents. Then focus on the nations already going towards circular economics with it, they need something like this as a sustainable adhesive. Anyway... that is what I am focusing on these weeks now *goes back to his hermit cave* On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 2:05 AM Marcus Rohrmoser <me+swicg@mro.name> wrote: > @hellekin, I couldn't agree more. > > Celebrities throwing cash won't make a respectful, vibrant community. > The fediverse shouldn't become another centricash. It thrives on broad > participation, sovereign operation and mutual respect among peers. > > Individual funding surely helps (I myself am running on an nlnet grant > right now) but shouldn't be mission-critical to the fediverse as a > whole. > > The fediverse must become much more inclusive to be noteworthy – > currently we still have an unsurmountable divide of operators and users. > Brittle, bloaty, enterpriish standards & implementations manifest that > divide. That must be overcome and evolved into participants. > > There's not much sense in discussing means without having clearly stated > the ends. > > Marcus > >
Received on Saturday, 15 April 2023 18:43:32 UTC