- From: Jacky Alcine <yo@jacky.wtf>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:07:24 -0400
- To: "Marcus Rohrmoser" <me+swicg@mro.name>, public-swicg@w3.org
Agreed. And I don't see any sort of online platform being safe if it removes things like moderation and increases the proliferation of digital capitalism through cryptocurrency - both of which are nonconductive to a safe online Web. Dorsey endorsed the current owner of Twitter - look where that went. I do not have or put a lot of stock into things that can exalt those who fund for the sake of it. It also goes without saying that making a new Internet protocol is going to less to make change than working with expanding current systems to be more interoperable. On Fri, Apr 14, 2023, at 04:04, Marcus Rohrmoser wrote: > @hellekin, I couldn't agree more. > > Celebrities throwing cash won't make a respectful, vibrant community. > The fediverse shouldn't become another centricash. It thrives on broad > participation, sovereign operation and mutual respect among peers. > > Individual funding surely helps (I myself am running on an nlnet grant > right now) but shouldn't be mission-critical to the fediverse as a > whole. > > The fediverse must become much more inclusive to be noteworthy – > currently we still have an unsurmountable divide of operators and users. > Brittle, bloaty, enterpriish standards & implementations manifest that > divide. That must be overcome and evolved into participants. > > There's not much sense in discussing means without having clearly stated > the ends. > > Marcus
Received on Friday, 14 April 2023 13:07:55 UTC