- From: Susie M Stephens <STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@LILLY.COM>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:39:36 -0400
- To: Melliyal Annamalai <melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com>
- Cc: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>, public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org
Hi Melli,
I'm completely happy for you to just edit the file.
BTW, how's the process going? Will you be done by Wednesday's call?
Cheers,
Susie
Melliyal
Annamalai
<melliyal.annamal To
ai@oracle.com> Susie M Stephens
Sent by: <STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@lilly.com>
public-sweo-ig-re cc
quest@w3.org W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Subject
Re: Use case facets
03/21/2008 03:02
PM
Hi Susie,needs to be edited, and that is the file that we will editing to include
the details for each facet category (as opposed to sending them via an
email). Does that make sense - or did you want the details on the list as
well before we edit the file?
Melli
PS: My note on the list responding to Susie's and Ivan's feedback was not
allowed to go through for some reason, I am reproducing it here -
essentially I am agreeing with Susie and Ivan that we will drop the 'level
of deployment' facet.
Susie, Ivan,
Thanks for your comments, and I think you are both making the same
point. I had not realized that the two categories - use cases and case
studies - reflected the level of deployment. I agree that we can drop
that facet.
Melli
Susie M Stephens wrote:
Hi Melli,
Will you be able to send out the details for each facet category by
Monday?
Cheers,
Susie
----- Original Message -----
From: Melliyal Annamalai [melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com]
Sent: 03/19/2008 10:12 AM AST
To: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Subject: Use case facets
Hi all, company. last week. If folks on the group are OK with these facets we will
start working on incorporating these in the webpage. with the following facets for the use cases. The first three are
already facets on the page now.
Institution's Activity Area
Application
Country
Benefits of using Semantics
Deployed or not: Choices are: Yes
Technologies used: Choices are: RDF, OWL, SPARQL, In-house ontology,
Public ontology from use case #5 (Case Study: Composing a Safer Drug Regimen for each
Patient with Semantic Web Technologies)
Institution's Activity Area: Healthcare
Application: Data integration, Data sharing
Country: USA
Benefits: Support of an evolving schema, Ability to represent
relationships
Deployed or not: Unsure (so we would not store anything for this
facet for this use case)
Technologies used: RDF, OWL, In-house ontology
Let us know what you think.
Melli and Lee
Received on Monday, 24 March 2008 20:40:33 UTC