- From: Susie M Stephens <STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@LILLY.COM>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 16:39:36 -0400
- To: Melliyal Annamalai <melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com>
- Cc: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>, public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org
Hi Melli, I'm completely happy for you to just edit the file. BTW, how's the process going? Will you be done by Wednesday's call? Cheers, Susie Melliyal Annamalai <melliyal.annamal To ai@oracle.com> Susie M Stephens Sent by: <STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@lilly.com> public-sweo-ig-re cc quest@w3.org W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org> Subject Re: Use case facets 03/21/2008 03:02 PM Hi Susie,needs to be edited, and that is the file that we will editing to include the details for each facet category (as opposed to sending them via an email). Does that make sense - or did you want the details on the list as well before we edit the file? Melli PS: My note on the list responding to Susie's and Ivan's feedback was not allowed to go through for some reason, I am reproducing it here - essentially I am agreeing with Susie and Ivan that we will drop the 'level of deployment' facet. Susie, Ivan, Thanks for your comments, and I think you are both making the same point. I had not realized that the two categories - use cases and case studies - reflected the level of deployment. I agree that we can drop that facet. Melli Susie M Stephens wrote: Hi Melli, Will you be able to send out the details for each facet category by Monday? Cheers, Susie ----- Original Message ----- From: Melliyal Annamalai [melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com] Sent: 03/19/2008 10:12 AM AST To: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org> Subject: Use case facets Hi all, company. last week. If folks on the group are OK with these facets we will start working on incorporating these in the webpage. with the following facets for the use cases. The first three are already facets on the page now. Institution's Activity Area Application Country Benefits of using Semantics Deployed or not: Choices are: Yes Technologies used: Choices are: RDF, OWL, SPARQL, In-house ontology, Public ontology from use case #5 (Case Study: Composing a Safer Drug Regimen for each Patient with Semantic Web Technologies) Institution's Activity Area: Healthcare Application: Data integration, Data sharing Country: USA Benefits: Support of an evolving schema, Ability to represent relationships Deployed or not: Unsure (so we would not store anything for this facet for this use case) Technologies used: RDF, OWL, In-house ontology Let us know what you think. Melli and Lee
Received on Monday, 24 March 2008 20:40:33 UTC