- From: Susie M Stephens <STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@LILLY.COM>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:25:00 -0400
- To: "Melliyal Annamalai" <melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com>, "W3C SWEO IG" <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF41381D35.3A6E7CD9-ON85257413.004F31D1@EliLilly.lilly.com>
Hi Melli, Will you be able to send out the details for each facet category by Monday? Cheers, Susie ----- Original Message ----- From: Melliyal Annamalai [melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com] Sent: 03/19/2008 10:12 AM AST To: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org> Subject: Use case facets Hi all, Late regrets, I got pulled into an urgent call at my company. Here is the note on the use case facets I should have sent last week. If folks on the group are OK with these facets we will start working on incorporating these in the webpage. We have come up with the following facets for the use cases. The first three are already facets on the page now. Institution's Activity Area Application Country Benefits of using Semantics Deployed or not: Choices are: Yes Technologies used: Choices are: RDF, OWL, SPARQL, In-house ontology, Public ontology Here is an example of some terms that we identified from use case #5 (Case Study: Composing a Safer Drug Regimen for each Patient with Semantic Web Technologies) Institution's Activity Area: Healthcare Application: Data integration, Data sharing Country: USA Benefits: Support of an evolving schema, Ability to represent relationships Deployed or not: Unsure (so we would not store anything for this facet for this use case) Technologies used: RDF, OWL, In-house ontology Let us know what you think. Melli and Lee
Received on Friday, 21 March 2008 14:25:48 UTC