- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 19:22:20 +0100
- To: "W3C SWEO IG" <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: nova@radarnetworks.com
[seems like a job for SWEO!] ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Nova Spivack <nova@radarnetworks.com> Hey guys – I'm supposed to be speaking about the semweb on a panel moderated by none other than Clay Shirky (who hates the semweb and generally misrepresents it) on Monday (at the Highlands Forum). I was wondering --- are there any stats I can cite about the semweb that will help to head of his criticisms? - Number of SPARQL endpoints, or growth of them? - Growth of semweb? Any metrics you know of? Anything else you think I might cite? Clay generally attacks the semweb on the grounds that social tagging is better than inferencing. Duh. That's a completely made-up conflict since the semweb is a natural fit with tagging, and secondly since the semweb does not only focused on inferencing. In any case, the question is how to deal with him. N -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Sunday, 18 March 2007 18:22:27 UTC